Impacts of Caffeine on Strength and Power in Athletes

Effects of Caffeine on Knee Extensor Strength Performance

Research indicates that caffeine consumption can lead to noticeable improvements in knee extensor strength and power. A recent study revealed that consuming caffeine capsules (CC) resulted in an increase of 11.22% in average peak torque at 60°/s, while caffeinated chewing gum (CG) produced a 7.32% increase compared to the placebo group (PLA) (Fiala et al., 2025). Similarly, average power metrics also showed significant enhancements, with CC and CG both contributing positively to performance outcomes.

The mechanism behind caffeine’s ergogenic effect primarily involves its role as an adenosine receptor antagonist, which subsequently increases the release of neurotransmitters, enhancing motor unit recruitment and muscle contraction efficiency. Studies have documented that caffeine facilitates the mobilization of calcium ions from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, a critical process for muscle contraction, thereby contributing to increased force production during exercises like knee extensions (Fiala et al., 2025).

Furthermore, the enhancement of vertical jump height (VJH) was observed in both CC and CG conditions, with increases of 5.58% and 6.09% respectively, indicating that caffeine not only boosts strength but also explosive power, which is crucial for many athletic performances.

Comparison of Caffeine Capsules and Chewing Gum

The efficacy of caffeine delivery methods is an intriguing area of investigation. In strength-trained males, CC demonstrated a more significant impact on strength parameters, while CG excelled in time-dependent measures such as time to peak torque (TPT). The faster absorption rate of CG may contribute to its effectiveness in immediate performance scenarios, allowing for quicker onset effects during competition or training sessions.

The comparative analysis of both forms showed that 80% of participants in the CC condition surpassed the smallest worthwhile changes (SWC) for knee extensor performance, while 66% in the CG condition experienced similar benefits. This variability in response underscores the need for individualized caffeine strategies based on specific athletic goals and conditions (Fiala et al., 2025).

Individual Responses to Caffeine Supplementation

The effects of caffeine are not uniform across all individuals; genetic variability significantly influences responses to caffeine supplementation. Genetic polymorphisms in the Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) gene, which encodes an enzyme responsible for caffeine metabolism, result in differing metabolic rates. Individuals classified as “fast metabolizers” may experience more pronounced ergogenic effects compared to “slow metabolizers,” who may not respond as effectively to caffeine dosing (Fiala et al., 2025).

Additionally, habitual caffeine consumption plays a critical role in determining individual responses. Athletes who regularly consume caffeine may develop a tolerance, potentially diminishing its performance-enhancing effects. Consequently, understanding an athlete’s caffeine habits and genetic predispositions is essential for optimizing supplementation strategies tailored to enhance strength and power outputs.

Role of Genetic Variability in Caffeine Metabolism

Genetic factors are crucial in determining how caffeine is processed in the body, which subsequently affects its performance-enhancing effects. The CYP1A2 gene variants can result in significant differences in the rate of caffeine metabolism, influencing not only the ergogenic response but also the potential side effects experienced by athletes.

Studies have shown that individuals with certain ADORA2A gene polymorphisms may have heightened sensitivity to the effects of caffeine, further contributing to performance variability. Consequently, athletes may benefit from genetic profiling to inform personalized caffeine supplementation strategies, optimizing performance outcomes while minimizing potential negative side effects (Fiala et al., 2025).

Implications for Training and Recovery Strategies in Athletes

The integration of caffeine supplementation into training and recovery strategies holds considerable promise for enhancing athletic performance. Coaches and nutritionists can leverage the findings on caffeine’s effects on knee extensor strength and power to inform training regimens. For instance, strategically timing caffeine intake around training sessions may maximize strength gains and improve recovery times.

Moreover, understanding individual responses to caffeine can lead to more personalized training programs. Athletes may optimize their performance by aligning caffeine consumption with their metabolic profiles, exercise types, and scheduling of competitions.

Additionally, ongoing research into the interaction of caffeine with other ergogenic aids and training modalities will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how best to utilize this compound within athlete nutrition and recovery plans.

FAQ

How does caffeine improve athletic performance?
Caffeine enhances performance by increasing adrenaline levels, mobilizing fatty acids from fat tissues, and improving muscle contraction efficiency through its action as an adenosine receptor antagonist.

Are there differences in the effects of caffeine capsules and chewing gum?
Yes, caffeine capsules generally lead to greater improvements in strength parameters, while chewing gum may provide quicker benefits in explosive power due to faster absorption.

How does genetic variability affect caffeine response?
Genetic factors, particularly variations in the CYP1A2 and ADORA2A genes, influence how caffeine is metabolized and how individuals respond to its supplementation.

What is the best way to use caffeine for strength training?
To maximize benefits, caffeine should be consumed approximately 30-60 minutes before training or competition, tailored to individual tolerance and metabolic response.

Can caffeine cause side effects?
Yes, excessive caffeine intake can lead to side effects such as jitteriness, increased heart rate, gastrointestinal distress, and sleep disturbances, particularly in individuals with lower tolerance.

References

1. Fiala, O., Hanzlova, M., Borska, L., & Holmannova, D. (2025). Beyond physical exhaustion: Understanding overtraining syndrome through the lens of molecular mechanisms and clinical manifestation. Sports Med Health Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2025.01.006
2. Meng, H., So, H., & Tam, L. (2025). Impaired fasting glucose and sulfonylureas increased the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01689-6
3. Güneş Kaya, D., et al. (2025). Recurrent education: A promising strategy for enhancing diabetes management and reducing hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01917-0
4. Wassmer, S. C., & Mohanty, S. (2025). Cerebral manifestations of falciparum malaria in adults: more than meets the eye. Trends Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2025.02.005
5. Demir, G., Özen, S., Çetin, H., & Gökşen, D. (2025). Effect of education on impaired hypoglycemia awareness and glycemic variability in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. JCRPE J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol